Case atlas — every figure of every case the hour shows
16 published cases · 119 figures, in the order the authors published them.
Click any figure to open it full size. Back to the deck in the other tab.
Monje 2025
Surgical- and implant-related factors and onset/progression of peri-implant diseases: An AO/AAP systematic reviewJournal of Periodontology 2025doi:10.1002/JPER.24-0083
Monje et al. 2025. Reproduced under CC BY.
Figure 1Flowchart of the screening process.Figure 2(A) Implant placed slightly towards the buccal aspect in the presence of a residual thin buccal bone. It is hypothesized that this could predispose excessive physiological bone loss that eventually leads to biofilm adhesion to the exposed implant surface. (a) Clinical image displaying peri-implant inflammation, (b) intra-operative image showing moderate bone loss in a crater-like defect, (c) periapical bone loss indicating severe bone loss, (d) occlusal view in a cone-beam computed tomography slice where it is suggested that the affected implant is slightly buccally aligned to the ideal bucco-lingual implant position when compared with another healthy implant in the same position of the left mandibular hemiarch.Figure 3(A)Peri-implantitis-relatedsupra-crestaldefectsareoftenassociatedtoimplantsveryclosetoeachother.(a)FrontalviewFigure 4Bacterial biofilm is the etiologic factor of peri-implant diseases. (A,B) Macro- and micro-structural topographic irregularities favor the adhesion of biofilm.
