Case atlas — every figure of every case the hour shows

16 published cases · 119 figures, in the order the authors published them. Click any figure to open it full size. Back to the deck in the other tab.

Levingston 2025

Assessment of the submandibular fossa depth and diameter of the mandibular canal via cone beam computed tomography: a comparative study Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2025 doi:10.1186/s40902-025-00473-w

Levingston et al. 2025. Reproduced under CC BY 4.0.

diameter mandibular canal
Figure 1Diameter of mandibular canal
types submandibular fossa type iii
Figure 2Types of submandibular fossa (a type I, b type II, c type III)
position deepest region submandibular fossa compared
Figure 3Position of the deepest region of submandibular fossa compared to mandibular canal
concavity angle
Figure 4Concavity angle
distribution submandibular fossa smf depth types
Figure 5Distribution of submandibular fossa (SMF) depth types and deepest SMF locations by sex
comparative graphical representation submandibular fossa depth
Figure 6Comparative graphical representation of submandibular fossa depth, cavity angle, and mandibular canal diameter across sex and side. This graph visually summarizes the mean measurements across the right and left mandibular regions in males and females, highlighting significant sex differences, particularly in mandibular canal diameter on the right side