Case atlas — every figure of every case the hour shows
16 published cases · 119 figures, in the order the authors published them.
Click any figure to open it full size. Back to the deck in the other tab.
Fernandes 2025
The Novel iMPACT Tool and Quadrant Protocol for Peri-Implantitis: Surface Refinement and Re-Osseointegration Validated by SEM/EDS and Long-Term Clinical Case ReportsMedicina 2025doi:10.3390/medicina61061094
Fernandes et al. 2025. Reproduced under CC BY.
Figure 1(a) iMPACT tool (new tool) to treat peri-implantitis through implantoplasty; (b) pin for connection and stabilization of the tool screwed in the dental implant; (c) (A) the cutting tool’s rotational motion, (B) preparing the area for treatment, (C) springs positioned above the working area, (D) fine-tuning the cutting depth and blade position is achieved using an adjustment nut; (d) detailed illustration showing the iMPACT’s blade in position for a standardized implantoplasty. The iMPACT, featuring the precision cutting blades, was used for simultaneous implantoplasty and controlled bone modificationFigure 2(a) The contaminated implant’s layer was removed meticulously under controlled con-ditions, with power control and accurate cutting, to achieve a smooth surface. (b) Large titanium particles generated during the process are easily detectable clinically. (c) New implant surface with an area average roughness (Sa) value of ~0.5 µm–binding energy of 459 eV; (d) The restored sur-face exhibits increased hydrophilicity using iMPACT (water drop angle 12.769◦); (e) Compared to traditional methods of implantoplasty (tungsten bur—water drop angle 49.086◦)Figure 3Applying the Quadrant protocol, the iMPACT tool was utilized to treat a case of peri-implantitis. After using iMPACT, the new implant surface was machined to be smoothFigure 4SEM and EDS analysis displaying the dental implant surface after treatment. The tests were conducted in triplicateFigure 5Periapical radiographies showing the re-osseointegration after using iMPACT and the Quadrant protocol. From the platform to the bone-implant contact (BIC), 9.1 mm was foundFigure 6Initial clinical assessment of sites #46 and #47Figure 7The periapical image taken for #46 and #47 (region of the complaint) shows relevant bone loss around the implants (red arrows showing the bone loss found, considering as reference the implant platform)Figure 8The initial panoramic radiograph reveals oral rehabilitation and bone loss in the lower posterior teethFigure 9Removing the screwed crowns and for the site evaluationFigure 10(a) BSF incision; (b) BSF raised; (c) BSF moved from buccal to lingual; (d) BSF raised exposing the implants and local boneFigure 11Quadrant protocol’s steps for the novel iMPACT tool applicationFigure 12The bone graft (allograft + xenograft) is in place, and the collagen membrane covers the bone graft for the GBRFigure 13Interrupted suture and bridge reattachment, ensuring surgical site protection and oc-clusal functionFigure 14Periapical images showing the evolution of the case (red arrows show the distance from the implant platform to the bone—(A) Baseline; (B) After 14 months; (C) After 43 months)Figure 15Clinical findings after 43 monthsFigure 16Panoramic radiographic view (a) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) (b), revealing bone loss at baseline at tooth #41, respectively, 8.5 mm and 9.0 mm (red arrows)Figure 17Step-by-step treatment for peri-implantitis using the iMPACT and Quadrant protocol. (a) Initial clinical evaluation; (b) Removing the abutments for peri-implantitis treatment; (c,d) BSF raised for implant exposition; (e) Insertion of the hinge (pin), which was crewed into the implant; (f) Hinge in position; (g,h) iMPACT adapted to the hinge; (i) iMPACT spinning for implantoplasty; (j) The implant surface was smoothed, and bone around the implant was gently cut (osteotomy); (k) occlusal view showing the osteotomy; (l) implantoplasty finished—implant surface is completely smoothed (machined); (m) Bone graft; (n) Suture and abutments were repositionedFigure 1812-month follow-up (#41)Figure 19(a) Initial clinical assessment; (b) Periapical X-ray presenting the measurements (red arrows) from the platform to the bone; (c) The panoramic view shows the vertical bone loss found at baselineFigure 20Fourth-quadrant condition after fixed prosthesis removalFigure 21(a) BSF performed; (b) BSF raised and reflected to the lingual side, exposing the implantsFigure 22(a) iMPACT tool was placed for implantoplasty; (b) iMPACT spinning to remove the contaminated threads, machining the implant surface; (c) Result obtained after treatmentFigure 23Radiographic bone level and probing depth comparing the baseline and 12-month resultsFigure 24(a) Clinical follow-up after 12 months; (b) Radiographic outcome after 12 months